🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

According to recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare it to what average American pays. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and less expensive strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.